ProFTPD mini-HOWTO - Logins and Authentication

## ProFTPD Logins and Authentication

Logging into to `proftpd` and being successfully authenticated by the server involves a lot of different modules and different checks. This document aims to discuss the sort of checks and configuration involved, and hopefully provide a better idea of how `proftpd` authenticates users.

PAM
PAM, which stands for Pluggable Aauthentication Modules, is an API intended to make it easy to replace the old Unix-style DES password hashes stored in `/etc/passwd` with a flexible system that allows system administrators to use MD5 checksums, SQL tables, LDAP servers, RADIUS servers, etc in place of that password check. However, what PAM does not provide is the rest of the user account information in `/etc/passwd`, i.e. the user's UID and GID, home directory, and shell. This means that PAM cannot be used as a drop-in replacement for user information stored in `/etc/passwd`. NSS (Name Service Switch) modules, supported by some operating systems, are a complementary API to PAM which can be used to supply the rest of this user information. `proftpd` uses the normal `libc` functions for looking up user information, and those `libc` functions typically read `/etc/passwd`. NSS is an abstraction layer within some `libc` implementations that causes those functions to read other sources rather than `/etc/passwd`. Regardless of NSS support, `proftpd` has support for "virtual" users via its authentication modules.

When configuring `proftpd`, the `configure` script will automatically try to determine whether your operating system supports PAM. If it does, the `mod_auth_pam` module will automatically be compiled into your `proftpd`. If you explicitly do not want PAM support, you can use the `--disable-auth-pam` configure option to disable this automatic detection. The point of using PAM is that it can provide an extra authentication step during a login. By "authentication", I mean that PAM answers a yes/no question: "Is this user who they say they are?". PAM modules are configured either in `/etc/pam.conf` or `/etc/pam.d/`, depending on your operating system. However, many of the PAM modules provided by vendors are not designed to work well with some of the authentication modules supported by `proftpd`. If PAM is not a necessity for you, and you plan to use one of the authentication modules (other than `mod_auth_unix`), you should consider disabling PAM in your `proftpd.conf`, like so:

      <IfModule mod_auth_pam.c>
        AuthPAMAuthoritative off
      </IfModule>

This configuration means that, if `mod_auth_pam` is present, `proftpd` will still use PAM as an additional check, but if that check fails, the login may still proceed (i.e. PAM is not the authority when it comes to user authentication). To disable use of PAM entirely, use:

      <IfModule mod_auth_pam.c>
        AuthPAM off
      </IfModule>

Configuration Directives
There are several configuration directives that can cause login problems. The most common one is `RequireValidShell`, so common that it is a FAQ. If `proftpd` does not actually use the shell configured for a user, why does it check to see if the shell is valid by looking in `/etc/shells`? Certain other FTP servers (e.g. `wu-ftpd`, `pure-ftpd`) do check for invalid shells and deny logins based on this criterion; `proftpd` follows this pattern so as not to surprise too many system administrators. Use of invalid shells is a common sysadmin trick for denying shell-based login access (e.g. `ssh` logins); many sites use other means, however, and so use of the `RequireValidShell` directive is also frequently seen.

Another reason why a client cannot login might be if the login user is `root` (or has a UID of zero, and hence has root privileges). Logging in as `root` is dangerous, and should be avoided if possible. If you do find it absolutely necessary to login as `root`, please use SSL/TLS, or at least tunnel your FTP connection using SSH. The `RootLogin` configuration directive is needed in your `proftpd.conf` in order for `proftpd` to explicitly allow root logins.

One uncommon obstacle that you might encounter to allowing a user to login is the possibility that that user is listed in an `/etc/ftpusers` file. This is another legacy check, courtesy of `wu-ftpd`. Any user that is listed in `/etc/ftpusers` is not allowed to login via FTP. A little backwards from what might be expected from the file name, I agree. `proftpd` was made to similarly honor any `/etc/ftpusers` file by default in order to ease the pain for sites migrating from `wu-ftpd` to `proftpd`. Disabling `proftpd`'s check for this file is as simple as using the `UseFtpUsers` configuration directive, like so:

      UseFtpUsers off

in your `proftpd.conf` file.

The `PersistentPasswd` configuration directive can be necessary in some environments, particularly those that use NIS/YP, NSS modules, or (in the case of Mac OSX) the `netinfo` service. In order to be able to lookup and map UIDs and GIDs to names, as when listing directories and files, `proftpd` tries to keep the `/etc/passwd` file open. This is particularly relevant if the `DefaultRoot` directive is in effect, for once `chroot`ed, `proftpd` cannot open `/etc/passwd`. However, services such as NIS, NSS, and `netinfo` function very differently while providing a file-like interface, and they do not function properly if `proftpd` keeps them open. Using:

      PersistentPasswd off

in your `proftpd.conf` should cause name lookups to work properly if you use NIS, NSS, or `netinfo`.

If you feel your logins are slow, then you might be encountering another FAQ. The timeouts when performing RFC931 `ident` lookups, and DNS reverse resolutions, add a noticeable delay to a login.

Anonymous Logins
Anonymous logins are allowed by defining an `<Anonymous>` section, or context, in your `proftpd.conf`. No `<Anonymous>` contexts mean that `proftpd` will not allow anonymous logins. As the documentation describes, `proftpd` knows to treat a given login name (given to the server by the client via the `USER` FTP command) by seeing if the login name is the same as the `User` name in an `<Anonymous>` context. For example:

      <Anonymous /var/ftp/anon/dave>
        User dave
        Group ftpanon
        ...
      </Anonymous>

would cause any client logging in as `dave` to be treated as an anonymous login, and to be handled using the `<Anonymous>` context above. This structure allows for multiple login names to be treated as anonymous logins, and for each anonymous login to have its own specific anonymous configuration. Some administrators use `<Anonymous>` contexts to define "virtual" users directly in their `proftpd.conf`, but this practice is discouraged. Virtual user accounts are discussed next.

Resolving `~`
I think this is what was happening: when a user logs in, proftpd looks up that user's info to make sure that the user has permission in their home directory proftpd uses that user's privs when resolving ~ your permissions on /home/webuser didn't allow that user to resolve ~ to /home/webuser/andytest so the DefaultRoot path is left as '~', rather than being replaced with the real home dir make sense?

Virtual Users
One question that often arises is "How do I create a proftpd user?" `proftpd` uses your system's `/etc/passwd` file by default, and so `proftpd` users are the same as your system users. "Virtual" users, sometimes described as FTP-only user accounts, are users that can login to `proftpd`, but who are separate from the normal system users, and who do not have entries in `/etc/passwd`. `proftpd` does not care how or where user information is defined. The daemon is designed with an abstraction layer on top of user information sources, and that abstraction is responsible for supplying that data that is required for every user: a name, a UID, a GID, a home directory, and a shell. A user's shell will not be used except in `RequireValidShell` checks, but it must still present. The code that is responsible for supplying this data, reading it from whatever storage format is supported, lies in `proftpd`'s various configurable authentication modules.

Authentication Modules
`proftpd` uses authentication modules for accessing user account information. These modules implement an API that that daemon uses to lookup account information by name or by ID, to authenticate a user using the provided password, and to resolve names to IDs or IDs to names. The following authentication modules are all provided with `proftpd`:

- `mod_auth_unix`
  Handles normal authentication via `/etc/passwd`, `/etc/group`

- `mod_auth_file`
  Handles the `AuthUserFile` and `AuthGroupFile` directives, for storing user account information in other files

- `mod_ldap`
  Handles user account information stored in LDAP directories

- `mod_radius`
  Handles user account information provided by RADIUS servers

- `mod_sql`
  Handles user account information stored in SQL tables

Note that `mod_auth_pam` is not on this list because it cannot provide the necessary user account information.

Since `proftpd` supports multiple authentication modules at the same time, how does it know which authentication module to use? What if you want to tell `proftpd` which modules to check, and in which order? What if you want some authentication modules to be used in one `<VirtualHost>`, and different authentication modules in another?

By default, `proftpd` will ask every configured authentication module about a given user, until it finds an authentication module that knows about that user, or until an authentication module signals an unrecoverable error. The order in which these modules are asked depends on the order of modules in the `--with-modules` option used when configuring `proftpd`.

Some modules can be figured to not "play nice" and allow other authentication modules a chance at providing user information. That is, some modules can be "authoritative", and if that module does not know about the user, it will signal an error and prevent `proftpd` from asking other modules. `mod_auth_pam`'s `AuthPAMAuthoritative` directive, and the `*` syntax in the `SQLAuthenticate` directive of `mod_sql`, are examples of this authoritativeness. In general, it is best to avoid using such mechanisms, and to use the `AuthOrder` configuration directive instead.

The following illustrates a situation where `AuthOrder` is useful. The default build of `proftpd` has two authentication modules included: `mod_auth_file` and `mod_auth_unix`. `proftpd` will consult both modules when authenticating a user: first `mod_auth_file`, then `mod_auth_unix`. (Note: versions of `proftpd` before 1.2.8rc1 would only support either `AuthUserFile` or `/etc/passwd`, but not both at the same time.) If any authentication module can authenticate a user, then authentication succeeds. This holds true of other authentication modules like `mod_ldap`, `mod_sql`, `mod_radius`, etc.

However, if you only want `proftpd` to use your `AuthUserFile` and no other authentication modules, then you would use the `AuthOrder` directive like this:

      AuthOrder mod_auth_file.c

Or, if you use `mod_sql` and wanted `proftpd` to check your SQL tables first, and then default to system users:

      AuthOrder mod_sql.c mod_auth_unix.c

Note that the `mod_auth.c` and `mod_auth_pam.c` modules should never be used in an `AuthOrder` directive.

Last Updated: $Date: 2004/04/10 18:01:18 $